Beyond Batteries
Tuesday, November 25th, 2008
Even though the majority of GSE is still powered by internal combustion engines, the industry is definitely trending toward electric vehicles. But for being the new trend, it’s ironic that we’re still using battery technology that was invented in 1859. And today’s modern motive power battery hasn’t changed much from the early 1900s. There are some good reasons why the lead-acid battery has remained on top; it’s powerful, durable and inexpensive, at least relative to the alternatives.
But there are some significant drawbacks. Lead-acid batteries are full of hazardous material, require frequent maintenance, and take a long time to recharge. For these reasons, there’s a good chance a new technology is going to finally replace the old. There are more possibilities that can be noted here, but below are some good prospects.
The first prospect is an upgraded version of lead-acid battery called thin plate pure lead (tppl), which is exactly what it sounds like. The plates are so thin they behave like spaghetti during the manufacturing process. Its main benefits are power density and ultra-fast recharge time, and that it’s maintenance free. This could be the transitional step away from lead-acid, particularly for GSE since the industry has already adopted fast-charge technology. Many of you are already familiar with tppl, which is found in the Odyssey brand battery.
The second prospect is the Lithium-Ion battery, which has already become the dominant technology for cell phone, laptops, and on-road electric vehicles. Its main benefits are power density, light weight, and that it’s also maintenance free. The benefits to GSE may never outweigh the cost, but with so many new Li-ion manufacturing plants ramping up for electric cars, you never can tell.
The big story in electric vehicle technology is fuel cells. A fuel cell uses a gas, such as hydrogen, as a kind of fuel to create electricity. The only emission from a hydrogen fuel cell is water and there is no “recharge” necessary. You will still have to “fill up” the tank when it’s empty, but that should only take a few minutes. Of course you’ll have to find a hydrogen fuel station, but let’s leave that for future post. There are many competing technologies within fuel cells. Hydrogen is clearly the most popular, but be looking for methanol fuels cells as well - they may be a faster path to widespread adoption.
All of these new technologies will be viable. In fact, they are all powering vehicles today. And in all probability, the price will eventually drop enough to compete with today’s lead-acid battery. The question is, which one will it be the dominant technology for GSE? I’m also curious how well our vehicle manufacturers keep up with electric technology. So we may have to wait a few more years, but I know of at least one battery company with a few surprises in 2009.
It’s the day after the Election and I’m feeling good. Yes, Obama was my candidate. But I’m feeling good about hope for the working stiffs and for aviation. Now, the jury’s out on whether Obama’s policies will or won’t help aviation generally. But my feeling is – why sit and moan about what could happen. Let’s all of us be part of making sure that aviation thrives. Take the environment – no, I haven’t turned into a tree hugger – but the green revolution is coming and why shouldn’t we be part of it? Aren’t airport ground personnel on the frontlines of airport operations? Don’t you have a first class view of what’s going on? Where’s the waste and how to we cut it?